Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House and Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary Essay

Henrik Ibsens A Dolls mansion house and Gustave Flauberts Madame Bovary both portray significant female characters. Both of these whole kit and boodle show 19th Century women striving for freedom. These works reveal the problems women of this time had in trying to become equal with their male counterpart. Noras gratification is seen by dint of her time with her children while Emmas happiness is never seen as she experiences stressful relationships. The female protagonists seek their freedom through secrecy, children and relationships.Nora Helmer from A Dolls House and Emma Bovary from Madame Bovary are very secretive with their lives. Noras secrets range from the hiding of the macaroons (59) to the loan for the sake of Torvalds health (54). This shows perhaps fear Nora may have with her husband. Nora ruff shows her secrecy with the clothes she wore for the masquerade party. Emmas secretive ways stem from her union to Charles. Emma hides her affairs with Leon and Rodolphe from an unsuspecting Charles. The affairs show what Emma would do for appreciation. Dramatic badinage is expressed with the fact that Charles fails to pay offingize of Emmas affairs until after her death.Children are a nonher important issue in the womens lives. Nora shows that she really cares for her children unlike Emma. Nora buys Christmas gifts for her children and plays hide-and-seek with them (61). Nora uses money to buy things for her children rather than herself showing that she doesnt think just of herself. Nora tells her children the strange man Krogstad wont hurt Mama (62). Emma is seen as a character foil of Nora with the fact that she does not care for her child. Her hatred for her daughter for the first time emerges when she hoped to have son. Having a son would anticipate revenge for all her sooner helplessness (101).Emma felt that a woman is held back and helpless. At the sight of her newborn, Emma faints as wish for a son doesnt come true (101). Emma doesnt really c are when she shoves Berthe into a chest of drawers and causes her to cry (124). Berthe Bovary is even thought of as ugly by her mother (124). Emma spends money for her own macrocosm in Madame Bovary. This shows that she only cares herself and no one else. The holes in Berthes stockings (272) show that Emma doesnt even care for her own child. The love Emma shows for her daughter reveals her mendacity, not real affection.Relationships are a very important component in the two works. Besides the relationships with their children, the women experience relationships with their adult counterparts. Friendship is a theme expressed in both works. Nora has a few friends while Emmas actions is a rationale for her not having friends. Noras friends include Dr. Rank and Mrs. Linde. Nora, who contrasts from the two for not having an occupation, is able to observe a friendship. Emma has her dismissal of women with the reasons coming from the differences she sees. Emma also doesnt have male friend s with the fact that neither Leon nor Rodolphe really care about her while she believes they do. Women such as Madame Tuvache dislike women like Emma after witnessing her not being faithful to her husband. Tuvache even once claimed that Emma is compromising herself (104).The relationships with fathers had an impact on Nora and Emmas lives. Both women were unhappy in their relationships with their fathers. Noras relationship with her father was best pictured with her being a doll in his doll house (109). Emmas relationship with her father was not a good relationship either. Being able to leave her father was at some sense, happy for Emma until her marriage.Work is seen as an issue and also some other type of relationship with the women as well. Both womens work came in the form of being a homemaker. Noras role as a housewife seemed at times more satisfying than a role in manual labor. Emmas role of a housewife was different as she paying(a) more attention to only herself than her own family. Both women also had maids in helping to keep the household running.The love lives of Nora and Emma determine the motives each character possessed. In A Dolls House, Torvald is seen giving Nora money from time to time. Nora seems truly happy with her marriage at first but it soon changes. At first Nora refers to herself as Torvalds little squirrel (77) and shows no frustration with the marriage. Nora also uses a loan she received to take the trip with Torvald. Nora also realizes that her and Torvald have been having an unsuccessful marriage by not having serious talks (108-9).The feelings of remaining a doll-child played an important role in Noras decision (109-10). Nora hopes of the miracle (89-90, 93) never come and it results in her leaving her family. After Emmas marriage with Charles, Emma realized that she did not really love Charles to begin with. The wedding bouquet (53, 83-4) that Emma later destroys shows the disappointment in her marriage. To satisfy her needs, Emma engages in affairs with Leon. After Leons departure, sorrow turns to happiness with a new affair with Rodolphe. Emma, who couldnt accept Charles and his personality, failed to realize how he really felt about her. Emmas death was an impact on Charles later demise.Nora from A Dolls House and Emma from Madame Bovary are very strong female characters portrayed in literature. Happiness and freedom are the most important themes in both womens lives. Striving for happiness and freedom came at a costly price, with death as Emmas fate. Noras happiness lies within her miracle of a better marriage. Nora always seems to be happy when she really is frustrated and unhappy. Emma never experiences happiness as her attempts fail and result in her death. The feminine struggle continues with the failed marriages and shows a strong message. The struggle reveals that not being equal can cause monetary value to the lives of people and their surroundings.Works CitedFlaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovar y. Trans. Mildred Marmur. New York PenguinGroup, 1979.Ibsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. Four Major Plays. Trans. Rolf Fjelde. New York